I recently came across an article that explored the idea of the “nemesis” in football, i.e. that team against which a club performs the worst. It’s a concept that crosses the minds of many fans – in the context of existential angst when you lose yet another game to your closest rival; in the context of hubristic triumph, when you consider a game won before it’s played because of past history; and in the context of casual fandom when television producers flash up some obscure statistic of past head-to-head encounters.
At the same time I found that article, I was building a new head-to-head exploration feature for my football site (it’s under the Tables section). The functionality displays a matrix showing head-to-head results using points, goals, and results metrics. I’d already built a rivalries page with historical data on the biggest derbies and the ability to explore past results for any match-up (also under the Tables section). So the idea of head-to-head match-ups was something I’d looked at casually before and the article helped me to think about other angles to explore in the data.
For this article here, I’ll show each Premier League side’s favorite opponent and most truculent adversary using average points per game as it’s what I’ve personally used to think about performance on a per-game basis. I’ve limited the analysis to match-ups where teams have played each other at least ten times, or at least five season of Premier League football together. That’s useful as it removes the perfect records that top teams have against minnows who have barely thrived in the top flight and allows for more interesting results. The tool on my site does not have any such limit so fans of Bournemouth, for example, can mosey on over there for more details.